A book controversy has just been released in Italy on the origins of this virus that shocked the world in the last six months. Professor Luc Montagnier, maligned in the media in April last year, sees its assertion that the virus was the result of human manipulation, and escaped (accidentally) in the laboratory of Wuhan, today included in this book. We track the events and excerpts of an interview of the author of the book, the Pr Tritto, in the media, the Italian Libero.
The statement of professor Luc Montagnier who has disturbed
On 17 April 2020, on Cnews, professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize for medicine in 2008 for his participation in the discovery of the virus responsible for aids, confirmed his statement that the SARS-CoV-2 is a human-produced.
This virus had been manufactured in the laboratory from the aids virus (HIV). “We came to the conclusion that there has been a manipulation of this virus. A part, I do not say the total. There is a model that is the virus classic, but to which has been added on top of the sequences of the HIV “.
“With my colleague, we have closely looked at the description of the genome of this RNA virus,” explained Luc Montagnier. Others had already explored this track : “indian researchers had already attempted to publish the results of analyses showing that this genome harbored sequences of another virus that is HIV, the AIDS virus, but they have been forced to retract, the pressures were too strong ! “.
Confirmed in a publication of July 30, 2020, after peer review
Attacked in the media and maligned by the scientific community, Luc Montagnier and Jean-Claude Perez, a doctor of mathematics, present their findings, which confirm the original statements :
The following analogy helps to illustrate this conclusion : imagine a puzzle-in-chief “coronavirus” of 30 000 coins and after several other puzzles to 9000 pieces each, that we will call HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV(retrovirus close to the HIV-2 whose target is the monkey). The mathematical proof shown, can be illustrated the following way : in the puzzle of 30 000 pieces, at a specific location are three parts that are contiguous (side by side) from each of the one of the other three puzzles. The probability that this result is natural is null and void.
“The chimera that changed the world : the covid-19 comes of Wuhan” by Joseph Tritto
This book published recently in Italy, came to the same conclusion, raising certainly the debate which interested the world because, for the moment, the doxa, it is his ” natural origin “, even if the american authorities have declared to be attentive to new information. The synopsis is in appendix I.
Joseph Tritto its author, is an Italian medical career and international academic. It is microchirurgien, an expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology and is president of the WABT (world Academy of sciences and biomedical technologies). “The chimera that changed the world “, is intended to cause a global debate, as the book shows, with scientific evidence that the coronavirus SARS-Cov-2 responsible for the Covid-19 was the result of an engineering laboratory. In this case, the laboratory of high safety of Wuhan.
Gianluca Veneziani of Libero, was interviewed for the Pr. Tritto, translation below.
Prof. Tritto, why have you written this book, in a dissertation against the version shared by the scientific community ?
JT : “there are two reasons. One is personal : I have friends Italian doctors who have operated in the front line during the epidemic. Some fell sick, one of them ended up in intensive care, and came out miraculously. The second reason is professional : I run an NGO, the WABT, which aims to analyze the ethical impact of biotechnology on the human being “.
Why do you think that, from a scientific point of view, the virus SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the Covid, has no natural origin, but is a chimeric recombinant created in the lab ?
JT : “The hypothesis accredited to date by several scientists is that this virus has been generated in nature by the combination of a virus of bats, and a virus of a pangolin. But, for that to happen, it would first have to wait between 40 and 200 years, according to the experts, and then that the two species share the same ecological niche, which is not the case here. In addition, there should be an intermediate host who contracts the virus recombined and transmitted to humans : but, in respect of the SARS-CoV-2, it has not yet been found. These elements would be sufficient to make the hypothesis of a natural origin of the virus is statistically unlikely and for the time being scientifically unprovable. But, there is another factor in the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 makes this hypothesis implausible.
And what is it ?
JT : “In several publications, for example in the study of the researchers of theIndian Institute of Technology New Delhi based on the genomes of patients, collected in global databases, it is shown that the SARS-CoV-2 is not only a hybrid between the virus of the bat and the virus of the pangolin. But, inside, there are small inserts of amino acid residues of the HIV-1 virusresponsible for aids. The presence of these inserts in a virus developed in nature could never occur. And, this is not all. The genome of SARS-CoV-2 shows another variation on what’s called the furin intracellularly, as confirmed by two studies, one Chinese, the other French-canadian. The two inserts have a specific function : the insert HIV-1 allows the SARS-Cov-2 to anchor itself to the human cell and enter the cell. It is therefore likely responsible for the high infectivity of the virus. The modification of the cleavage site furinique allows the virus to multiply in the cell and makes it highly pathogenic “.
For what purpose this virus chemical would it have been created ? As a weapon of bioterrorism, or only for scientific studies ?
JT : To give an answer, we need to go back in 2005. After theSARS epidemic, the Institute of virology of Wuhan has been founded, led by professor Shi Zheng-Li, who has spotted the coronavirus in some species of bats, and has recombined with other viral components to create vaccines.
In 2010, she came in contact with american researchers led by professor Ralph Baric, who works to turn on virus recombined based on coronavirus.
Thanks to the virus, “mother” provided by Shi, Baric created in 2015 a chimeric SARS-virus of the mouse, which has a pathogenic effect on human cells in vitro. From this moment on, China and the United States compete with each other. Shi wants to work on a virus more powerful to make a vaccine more effective : combining in vitro a virus of bats with a virus of a pangolin and in 2017 it will publish the results of this research in several scientific articles.
His research aroused the interest of the military sector and medico-biological chinese who are interested in biological weapons used as a deterrent for defensive purposes, and offensive. Thus, Shi is supported by doctors and biologists of the mid-politico-military, such as Guo Deyin, a specialist in vaccines against aids and viral hepatitis, and expert in the techniques of genetic recombination.
The introduction of the new inserts in the genome of the virus is the result of the collaboration between the team of Shi and Guo Deyin. The realization of this new chimera, from a scientific point of view, is a success. So much so, that once the epidemic began, the two researchers have asked the’WHO to save it as a new virus, the H-nCoV-19 (Human new Covid–19), and not as a other virus-derived SARS. It is reasonable to think that Shi has acted only from the point of view of the scientific prestige, but without taking into account security risks and interests, politico-military that his research would have raised “.
How, on the other hand, the virus has he been able to escape from the lab ? By an accident, a theft or the deliberate release into the environment ?
JT : I exclurais this last hypothesis, which would have harmed the Chinese, as well as the flight, as the laboratories of this type are very controlled. The accidental leakage, caused by a power failure, or accidental contamination of personnel, are more likely. Too many people moving in the laboratory of Wuhan : the more individuals, the greater the risk of contamination is great. In addition, many people from the laboratory had no specific training to treat certain virus in a coordinated manner and thorough.
Why China doesn-t-she never provided the complete genome of the virus to the WHO or other countries ?
JT : Because that provide the virus master would have meant recognizing that the SARS-CoV-2 has been created in a laboratory. In fact, in the genome incomplete made available by China, it is missing some inserts coding for amino acids of AIDS, which act as irrefutable proof. In the meantime, negotiations are underway between the intelligence agencies of 5 countries (United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, and China. The first, perhaps, through diplomatic negotiations, would be ready to overlook the responsibilities of the chinese, which he has the evidence, in exchange for the opportunity to obtain the matrix of the virus to develop a universal vaccine “.
Will we one day such a vaccine ?
JT : It is extremely unlikely to find a single vaccine to block the virus, given the many mutations of the SARS-CoV-2. At present, 11 different strains have been identified : the genetic lineage A2a developed in Europe, and the line B1 which has taken root in North America are more infectious strain 0 a native of Wuhan. So I think we could at most find a multivalent vaccine, which is valid for 4-5 strains, and is able to cover 70-75% of the world’s population “.
To conclude, the work of Professors Montagnier, Perez, and Tritto, the geneticist Alexandra Henrion Claude wonders whether it also on the origin of the virus, with little of the relays in the mainstream media. Self-censorship, inconvenient truth, geo-political, it is obvious that this subject demands to be thorough. Beyond issues of political-economic, to establish the origin of some of the virus will help to find a medical solution (vaccine or otherwise) much more quickly.
ANNEX I Synopsis of the book
Editions Cantagalli, Siena come to publish the book of professor Tritto ” Cina COVID 19. The Chimera che ha changed il mondo “, ” China Covid 19. The chimera that changed the world “. 272 pages.
About the author : professor Tritto is a doctor urology, andrology, microsurgery, infertility, and professor of micro-technology and nanotechnology in the United Kingdom and India. He is a visiting professor and director of the nano-medicine at Amity University, New Delhi (India). He is president of the world Academy of sciences and biomedical technologies (WABT), a non-governmental institution founded in 1997 under the auspices of UNESCO.
For the Pr Tritto, the Covid-19, which infects and kills around the world, is not a natural virus. He says that it was created to Wuhan, in a laboratory of biosafety level 4. Not only the chinese scientists, but also the French and the americans have contributed to the production of this ” chimera “. Professor Tritto clearly explains the origins of the virus, born from the attempt of chinese to study vaccines against SARS, by inserting the genomes of HIV in the bodies (which makes them more aggressive), while adding elements of coronavirus found in bats horseshoe, according to a method called reverse genetics system 2.
Professor Shi Zheng Li, head of the laboratory of Wuhan, is presented as the figurehead of these experiments in genetic engineering, the laboratory has received assistance from the French government and the Pasteur institute, of which the Chinese have learned to use the genomes of HIV.
Some american scientists have also helped, in particular professor Ralph S. Baric, University of North Carolina, with funds from the United States Agency for international development (USAID). The american scientists were interested in the study of coronavirus, which is prohibited in their country until 2017 because of their dangerousness.
The laboratory P4 of WuHan is intended to combat the disease is gradually transformed into the office of studies of bio-engineering to construct biological weapons are deadly.
This is not a coincidence if, in the course of the past five years, the laboratory of Wuhan has received the largest part of the funding of the China research virological, transforming it into an advanced research centre under the direct control of the chinese Academy of sciences and of the chinese government.
According to professor Tritto, professor Shi Zheng-Li ” probably had no interest in doing work for the army or for other purposes, unless it be compelled to do so.
The general division of the people’s liberation Army Chen Wei, an expert in biochemical weapons and bioterrorism, was appointed to the head of the Institute of virology of Wuhan, working with a team including Zhong Nanshan, a respiratory physician considered with a long experience in pulmonary diseases infectious.
Since the Institute of virology of Wuhan, has been placed under the control of the chinese army, we do not know anything of professor Shi Zheng-Li, who seems to have disappeared.
In the book of professor Tritto, scientists are not presented in their best light. Driven by the desire of knowledge, they become power-hungry, ambition, career and money.
A part of the book is devoted to the research on vaccines, in which institutes and laboratories are in competition, not for medical reasons, and save millions of patients with coronavirus, but only to be the first to sell vaccines in the world. China is well placed in this field.
According to professor Tritto, Beijing would not have published partial data, and has not made available the original genetic structure of the sars coronavirus (virus mother). Why ? Because it is only with the original structure of the virus that it is possible to produce a vaccine that is truly universal, efficient, everywhere on earth. Over time, viruses mutate and a vaccine produced by a mutated virus is only effective during a certain period and in certain areas.
Many heroes are presented in this pandemic. In addition to the doctors and nurses who have given their lives to the care of patients when they arrived in large numbers in the emergency, it is necessary to quote the first doctors who reported the outbreak in Wuhan, who have been forced to silence by the police, threatened with dismissal. The Dr Ai Fen, who reported a “strange flu” as early as November and has been muzzled by the hospital authorities. Dr. Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist who has been forced to shut up and then died of the Cociv-19, infected by one of his patients. We do not know currently, there is the Dr Ai Fen, which is missing.
The book of professor Tritto is also interested in the world health Organization, which has become, according to many, a “puppet” in the hands of China, an accomplice of his silence on the epidemic.
The book is not only turned towards the past. Professor Tritto wants to see the global rules adopted for the research on chimeras, laboratories of biosafety level 4 and the cooperation between military laboratories and civilian. China and other countries should also be forced to sign the Convention on biological and toxin weapons (BTWC)
ANNEX II : Outcome of the work of Luc Montagnier and Jean-Claude Perez
We are faced with the global proliferation of a new coronavirus. This follows a number of outbreaks of limited of related viruses at various locations in the recent past (SARS, MERS). While the main goal of researchers is to bring therapeutic solutions and effective preventive to the world’s population, we also need to better understand the origin of the epidemic is newly induced by the coronavirus in order to prevent future outbreaks.
This evaluation molecular is to be studied by an approach bio-infomatique the facts about the virus and its precursors.
In fact, the study shows how 16 fragments (genes Env, Pol and Integrase) of different strains, both diverse and very recent, of the retrovirus HIV1, HIV2 and SIV are very likely to be present in the genome of the Covid-19.
In addition, each of these elements is composed of 18 nucleotides or more and may therefore have a function. They are called Elements of Informative Exogenous (EIA).
Among these fragments, 12 of which are concentrated in a very small region of the genome of COVID-19, length less than 900 bases, or less than 3% of the total length of the genome. In addition, these footprints are positioned in 2 functional genes of the Covid-19 : genes of advanced orf1ab and S.
In summary, a contiguous region representing 2,49% of the whole genome of the Covid-19 40. 99% is made up of 12 various fragments from different strains of the retrovirus HIV-SIV. Some of these 12 EIA appear to be concatenated.
In particular, the section of retroviral in these regions, which consists of 8 items, of different strains of HIV1, HIV2 and SIV covers a length of 275 bases contiguous to the Covid-19. The combined length of these 8 elements in HIV / SIV represents 200 bases.
Therefore, the density of HIV-SIV in this region of the Covid-19 is of 72,73% (200/275).
A large part of these 16 EIA already existed in the first genomes of SARS in 2003. However, we demonstrate how a new region consisting of 4 HIV1 HIV2 Exogenous Information Elements differed radically all strains of the Covid-19 of all strains of SARS and bats, with the exception of the one of the bat RaTG13. We collect facts about the possible origins of the Covid-19. We have particularly analyzed this small region of 225 basis common to the Covid-19 and bat RaTG13. We have studied the genetic evolution of the most recent strains of the Covid-19 involved in the global epidemic. We found a significant occurrence of mutations and deletions in the area of 225 bases. On the genomes of sampling, we show that this key region of 225 bases from each genome, rich in EIA, and the region of 1770 bases SPIKE evolves much faster than the whole genome, corresponding (in the case of the 44 genomes of patients in the State of WA Seattle, epicenter original in the United States). In the comparative analysis of the genesis of the SPIKES of the Covid-19 and the bat RaTG13, we note two facts abnormal :
1) the insertion of 4 amino acids contiguous PARR in the middle of the SPIKE (we show that this site was already a cleavage site optimal BEFORE this insert).
2) an abnormal distribution of synonymous codons in the second half of SPIKE.
Finally, we show the insertion into the region of 1770 bases SPIKE a pair significant Heia Plasmodium Yolii and a possible EIA HIV1 with a mutation crucial Spike.
The authors are Jean-Claude Perez, PhD Math § Computer science University of Bordeaux, RESEARCHER INTERDISCIPLINARY RESTATED (IBM Emeritus, IBM European Research Center on Artificial Intelligence Montpellier), Bordeaux Métropole, France, and Luc Montagnier , Paris, France