TRIBUNE : What does he have to be okay in the head of the Head of State to declare war and “at the same time” call as soon as the vast majority of our compatriots to stay in position ?
On 16 march 2020, on hits 20: 00, Emmanuel Macron, President of the French Republic, 3rd nuclear power in the world, is expressed with a tone in which the tragic reminded more Gérard Philippe Charles de Gaulle.
“We are in a war,” he repeated. ” All the shelters,” he ordered. Lapidary, this summary does not deform to the extent nothing to the reality of his words.
What does he have to be going on in the head of our young President for surjouer as its partition-Chief of the Armed forces ?
Nowhere in the world we have witnessed such logorrhée martial. Even Donald Trump, quite comfortable in the role of matamore, has not ventured on the paths of war.
Jupiter was he so jealous of March ? Always inclined to a parody of its glorious elders, Macron did it this time enroll in the no Clemenceau and “make war” ?
Has this little game, Macron has not supported the comparison :
His failure is personal and takes in 3 acts : an unpreparedness strategic, a delegation risky, of his command, and a general demobilization of its troops.
No need to be a specialist of Sun Tsu and Von Clausewitz to understand where the gains and where it loses a war, to anticipate the conflict, to mobilize all of its troops and to have a vision to military strategy and clear to give clear orders.
“Si vis pacem, para bellum “. Jupiter would have lost its latin ? : If you want peace, prepare for war. The old adage is not proper may not be with the modernity of our President.
Not enough masks, not enough tests, not enough coat, not enough respirators, not enough hospital beds…
Certainly, the threat of a global pandemic was known to all. By indulgence, let us assume, however, that the unpreparedness of the Head of State was no exception in the concert of nations. However, one would expect more caution from the Chief of the Armed forces. Because a war that is not prepared is a war that will be lost. And we do not declare wars for the lose.
What does it matter ! “A win without risk is to triumph without glory,” said Rodrigue. The plume cannot be missed to the President and the latter decided to take up the glove. As to souls well born, the value is the number of years.
So, he organized his army as Napoleon Bonaparte, appointing 12 generals in a Scientific Committee, a sort of “task force” of help to the decision, the establishment of which is recommended in all small precise management sold in train stations and airports.
As soon as the first battles, the general of the Committee are wrong, and underestimate the enemy invisible. Needless to expound more on the organization of the 1st round of the municipal or on the rout scientist on the proper use of masks : the facts are already known.
What we do not yet have enough consciousness, is the extraordinary demobilization of a significant part of the medical staff that has been orchestrated by the scientific committee. In this case, the hospital has been chosen as the cornerstone of THE health strategy, a strategy that voluntarily made the impasse on the sector liberal.
Of course, the hospital staff has not done very well. He even showed a lot of courage and ingenuity to overcome unpreparedness strategic to the State. Why go knowingly of the divisions of the sector liberal ?
Liberal doctors having nothing to do, private clinics, empty, equipment, clinics are under-used, nurses confined, testing laboratories private forgotten : at the height of the crisis, the scientific committee has chosen to pass a considerable number of our forces.
Error of casting to the obvious.
How Macron has delegated its power of decision to the ” nobility of the gown “, to the first climber of the medicine, tells us a lot about the ideology of technocratic President. This ideology puts the Saint-Simonianism and the government experts at the heart of political action. This ideology macroniste watermark we strongly suggest that there are elites chosen to lead the people.
The President has therefore handed over its power and at the same time, ” the destinies of France in the hands of this committee. Committee whose members are all coming from a sort of caste university hospital in which the dogmatism and elitism may come as a surprise.
However this caste is not specifically illustrated in the field of honour. Because the battles that the members of the Scientific Council have carried out have never exceeded the narrow framework of their hospital services respective.
Questions arise, therefore, on the mode of selection of the members of the Scientific Committee. Many leading medical authorities are opposed to the decisions of the scientific committee. Why Macron a-t-il decided to choose one and disregard the others ?
Prince most likely. Jupiter seems to have chosen his generals on a roll of the dice or by examining the entrails of birds. Bad omen. Now it is too late : the spell is cast.
Where these generals were they so their legitimacy ? Were they prepared, as are the military to hold in their hands the fate of a nation ? Rhetorical Questions of course.
Emmanuel Macron has not simply been content to delegate his authority. He has also abdicated his power of control on this Scientific Committee. Do was enough for him-he’s not asking a few simple questions : “members of the scientific committee, provide me the evidence that the use of masks is superfluous” ? Rhetorical Question of course.
This loss would not be total if the President had not failed in its role of mobilisation.
After having asked his People to stay in the shelter, his ministers, noting that the situation was critical on the economic plan, they asked all the foot soldiers going to the front.
What are ” these people who are nothing “ like the fanciest Macron and therefore asked to mount in the first line, deprived of masks, and poorly equipped. Nice effort of national cohesion, which was to send its troops to the more fragile feed the better off.
And as one has well said that the masks were useless, they had no reason to believe the contrary. But all of this rhetoric masks was a lie… A lie taken for the Reason of State !
But to re-read Machiavelli’s the Prince, the lies based on the Reason of State does not have a vocation to be discovered in less than 15 days. It is not improvised Florentine later on. It is not included in the footsteps of François Mitterrand as this.
The inability to predict and the lies of the State are then become in the mouth of Macron ” failures, delays, of unnecessary procedures and weaknesses in logistics “.
But the unity is based on trust and trust is built on truth.
Apprentices liars of the reason of state have made the bed of protest and defiance popular. Their lies have resulted in the release largely, the people who were then questioned, and with good reason the word of the state.
Author(s): Igaal Hanouna for FranceSoir