LABOR RIGHTS Airline did commit discriminatory “differential treatment”
Air France plane, here on the tarmac at Toulouse Blagnac airport . — FRED SCHEIBER/20 MINUTES
Air France did indeed discriminate by prohibiting one of his stewards the wearing of Afro braids, a hairstyle also authorized for air hostesses, estimated that the Court of Cassation. “The requirements for the exercise of the profession of steward do not justify prohibiting” such a hairstyle and, by authorizing it for women but not for men, the airline has indeed committed “different treatment” discriminatory, ruled the highest French court in a decision rendered this Wednesday.
Read Also
- La France insoumise: first political council, without Ruffin, Autain, Corbière or Garrido Jan 16, 2023
- Technical control of two-wheelers: Its implementation planned for 2023 promises to be complicated Nov 21, 2022
- Haiti earthquake death toll rises to 1,297 Aug 16, 2021
- The gendarmerie warns against theft at the “rendez-moi” Nov 22, 2022
- Spanish justice admits complaint against Gustavo Petro for the kidnapping of journalist Fernando González Pacheco by the M-19 May 30, 2022
- iOS 13 : here’s why your iPhone battery life has plummeted… Jul 10, 2020
- Exercise Economic analyst Jan von Gerich, 42, built a ninja track in his backyard and got skeptical glances at the hardware sto Sep 6, 2021
Hired in 1998 by Air France, the steward had been wearing “African braids tied in a bun” since 2005. The company then refused him boarding “on the grounds that such a hairstyle was not authorized by the manual (…) for male cabin crew” The employee carried a wig for several years to be able to perform his duties, before seizing the prud’hommes in 2012 for discrimination. Air France has updated it. foot a few months later for “presenting not in compliance with the rules of wearing a uniform”. The steward was then declared “definitely unfit” in 2016 due to depression recognized as an occupational disease, then dismissed in 2018, having refused reclassification as ground staff.
“Hair style is neither part of the uniform nor an extension of it”
After a refusal to the prud’hommes, the Paris Court of Appeal had to in turn rejected, in November 2019, his claims for damages for discrimination, moral harassment and disloyalty, back pay and nullity; of his dismissal. To remove discrimination against gender, the Court of Appeal cited an “acceptable difference in appearance (…) between men and women in terms of dress, hairstyle, footwear and make-up” and felt that such a difference “which takes up the codes in use cannot be qualified as discrimination”.
But the Court of Cassation recalls that the labor code n’ authorizes differences in treatment between employees only if they meet “ genuine and determining occupational requirements, which is not the case in this case. In particular, she emphasizes that “the way of doing one’s hair is neither a part of the uniform nor its extension” and that “social codes” invoked by the Court of Appeal “are not objective criteria which justify a difference in treatment between men and women”.