WASHINGTON – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has hit a provider of income-share agreements with a consent order, alleging that the company failed to comply with consumer protection law.
Better Future Forward Inc., a nonprofit based in Virginia, “falsely represented” to students that their ISA products were not a type of loan, according to a CFPB press release. It is the first time that a national regulator has asserted that the alternative educational finance product is a form of student loan debt.
The watchdog agency also said that the firm failed to provide adequate disclosures to customers and violated a federal ban on prepayment penalties imposed on borrowers who seek to pay off debts early.
“The ISA industry has tried to evade oversight by claiming that its products are not loans,” the CFPB’s acting director, Dave Uejio, said in the press release. “But regardless of the name on the label, these products are credit and have to comply with federal consumer protections.”
Read Also
- This way you can check your voting position for the presidential elections this May 29 May 28, 2022
- New York: Donald Trump in civil trial for tax evasion in October 2023 Nov 23, 2022
- The regime of Daniel Ortega asked Congress to dissolve the Nicaraguan Academy of Language May 31, 2022
- Simce: bill that modifies evaluation will be sent to Congress in March 2023 Nov 10, 2022
- Peru: Two dead in growing protests against new president Dec 12, 2022
- White House favors Emory’s Kristin Johnson for CFTC seat Sep 2, 2021
- Iraq votes in elections marked by continuity despite the division of the Shiites Oct 10, 2021
“The ISA industry cannot pretend that core consumer protection laws do not apply to their products,” Uejio said.
The CFPB is ordering Better Future Forward to comply with the Truth in Lending Act, Regulation Z and the Consumer Financial Protection Act. The agency also mandated that the ISA provider reform the structure of its student contracts and refrain from charging prepayment penalties.
Bloomberg News
Through ISAs, a borrower receives tuition dollars in exchange for a percentage of post-education income. The products have been criticized for some time by consumer advocates, who have called on state and federal regulators to scrutinize the sector.