When considering planets to look for extraterrestrial life, astronomers are mostly drawn to what is familiar. The best candidates for habitable planets are considered to be the most Earth-like: small, rocky, with breathable atmospheres and a mild warmth from their stars.
But since several planets have been discovered outside the solar system, astronomers debated the usefulness of these definition schemes. Some planets in the so-called habitable zone, where temperatures are right for liquid water, are probably not good for life at all. Others outside that designated area may be perfect for hosting life forms.
Now, two studies propose to revise the concept of “habitable zone” to take into account more planets that astronomers may encounter in the cosmos. A new definition brings more planets in the habitable fold; the other takes out some.
“Both articles focus on questioning the classic idea of the habitable zone. We should extend the range of places we observe so that we don’t miss the habitable planets, ”says Penn State University astronomer Noah Tuchow.
Read Also
- Jeff Bezos, returning to Earth from his trip to space: ‘It’s the best day of my life’ Jul 20, 2021
- An Iranian aerospace engineer who worked on missile and drone design has died under suspicious circumstances Jun 4, 2022
- Energy crisis: While waiting to switch to LEDs, Rennes has turned off the facades of majestic buildings Dec 13, 2022
- India is bringing free Wi-Fi to more than 1,000 villages this year Apr 21, 2021
- Stay connected without harming the environment, advice to follow Jul 27, 2020
- They develop a new prototype of an LED bulb that emits less blue light May 29, 2021
- Discovery: Five Centuries Later, Researchers Decipher Charles V’s ‘Encrypted Letter’ Nov 24, 2022
Some neglected planets may be much larger than Earth as well potentially not receiving starlight at all. Cambridge University astrophysicist Nikku Madhusudhan and colleagues propose a new category of possibly habitable planets, which could be found at any distance from any type of star.
These hypothetical planets have a global ocean of liquid water immersed in a dense hydrogen-rich atmosphere. Madhusudhan calls them planets “Hycean”, for “hydrogen” and “ocean”. They could be up to 2.6 times larger than Earth and up to 10 times more massive, according to Madhusudhan and colleagues on Aug.25 in the Astrophysical Journal.
That dense atmosphere could keep temperatures right for liquid water too with minimal one star input, while the ocean could protect anything alive from overwhelming atmospheric pressure.
“We want to expand beyond our previously established paradigm on Earth-like planets,” says Madhusudhan. “Everything we have learned so far about exoplanets is extremely varied. Why limit ourselves when it comes to life? “