A motorbike rider caused an accident, under the influence, on a roundabout in October 2018 but his trial has just reached its conclusion.
The original guilty verdict was given in May this year but he decided to take his case to the appeals court, which has now just rejected it.
The appeal being thrown out is hardly surprising, however.
At the time of the accident, he was given a breathalyser which gave a 0.68ml of alcohol per liter of air exhaled.
Read Also
- The Conings family thinks that a soldier was murdered, but does not see a legal process Jul 1, 2021
- Laetitia Milot announces great news… Matt Pokora is opening a new restaurant… Nov 18, 2022
- NASA has shown ten years of life of the Sun in one video Jun 27, 2020
- Neither strange creatures nor sea monsters: scientists found plastic deep in the sea Jun 3, 2021
- Argentine rugby player Juan Cruz will play Malia in Toulouse, the best team of the 14 best teams in France. Jan 19, 2021
- La Baule: Found guilty of the murder of her spouse, she receives 20 years in prison Nov 22, 2022
- Roberto Villar Wins The XXXI Ciudad De Coria Story Award With The Work ‘Variable Humidity In Cabo De San Tadeo’ Jun 10, 2021
Naughty, but the police had more pressing things to do like get him to a hospital because his legs had new articulation possibilities that the Good Lord or Evolution had never intended.
Now, once in hospital, the doctors asked for his consent to a blood test at the behest of the police officers, which the rider agreed to, signing a form.
However, his lawyer based the appeal on that no consent had been given for the blood test, therefore the results which showed alcohol and cocaine consumption, were not valid and could not used as evidence against him.
When confronted by the document he had signed, he said that the signature was not his. The magistrate, however, was not buying it, stating, that the court was unable to believe the existence of a confabulation between the police and the medical staff to claim that the accused consented to a blood test when he hadn’t.
The result is that the original sentence that imposed a 1,680-euro fine and an 18-month driving ban stands.
(News: City & Metropolitan Area, Granada, Andalucia)