A US judge signaled he won’t immediately terminate Libor, rejecting an effort by a group of borrowers who argued the benchmark is the product of a “price-fixing cartel.”
The tentative ruling Thursday by US District Judge James Donato in San Francisco is a win for some of the world’s biggest banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Credit Suisse Group and Deutsche Bank. The banks argued abruptly ending the London interbank offered rate would wreak havoc on financial markets and undermine years of work reforming the reference rate.
The plaintiffs, which include 27 consumer borrowers and credit card users, argued Libor is an illegal price-fixing agreement. The lawsuit seeks to prohibit the benchmark, or set it at zero with borrowers repaying capital but not interest.
Donato said he wasn’t convinced the consumers’ request for an injunction halting the use of Libor met the legal test of urgency.
Read Also
- Overwatch 2 will be used for the Overwatch World League 2022 Sep 4, 2021
- Montenegro – France LIVE: Les Bleues need to regroup after the slap received in the half… Follow this game for 3rd place with us… Nov 20, 2022
- Liverpool’s requirements to qualify for the Champions League Semifinals Apr 14, 2021
- The millionaire that Checo Pérez generated in social networks after his victory, renewal and Monaco scandal Jun 3, 2022
- The UEFA Champions League final on a giant screen Jun 6, 2022
- Hierarchy and quality, Allegri starts again from three: in goal he finds “his” Juve Jul 20, 2021
- With a terrific performance from Jimmy Butler, Miami beat the Lakers and cut the lead in the NBA Finals Oct 5, 2020
“It’s been 35 years that Libor’s been on the books,” Donato said. “Isn’t that enough in itself to show there’s no irreparable harm?”
But the judge also said the litigation isn’t over. “I’m not saying you don’t have an underlying case,” Donato told lawyers for the consumers. “That’s a different day.”
Libor is derived from a daily survey of bankers who estimate how much they would charge each other to borrow. It’s used to help determine the cost of borrowing around the world, from student loans and mortgages to interest rate swaps and collateralized loan obligations, and continues to underpin hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial assets around the world.
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, regulators discovered that lenders had been manipulating the rates to their advantage, resulting in billions of dollars of fines. For over three years, policy makers around the globe have been developing new benchmarks to replace Libor.
The case is McCarthy v. Intercontinental Exchange, 20-cv-05832, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).