The League’s Romeo: “The Zan bill responds to market logic, they want to sell enamels to men”

Failed any mediation on the Zan bill, we go to the clash in the Senate classroom. The discussion in the Senate of the bill against homotransphobia first signed by the deputy Pd AlexanderZan, already approved by the House on 4 November, will begin Tuesday at 16.30. The choice already made in the conference of group leaders by the majority in favor of the text (Pd, Leu, 5 Stelle and Italia viva) was confirmed yesterday in the Chamber. The proposal of the center-right (Forza Italia and Lega) was instead to postpone the vote to July 20, but it was rejected, as the group leader announced in the morning Davide Faraone, also Italia Viva – despite expressing numerous reservations – voted in favor of scheduling as of 13 July. Yes also by the autonomist group leader Julia Unterberger. On the contrary, the united center-right. “Within Forza Italia there are different sensitivities with respect to this text, and for this reason we asked that it not be catapulted by the Commission – where we are in the hearings phase – to the Chamber within a week. In this way the Chamber is forced to vote on the text without being able to present amendments “, said the leader of the Azzurri in the Senate. Annamaria Bernini, asking to postpone the date of the discussion. After Bernini, the group leader of the Brothers of Italy took the floor Luca Ciriani, who asked for the bill to be completely eliminated from the calendar of works: “No downward mediation is needed, the text must be substantially changed.

After other interventions, he took the floor Maximilian Romeo. For the league leaderthe gender fluidity that the yellow-reds want to introduce is linked to marketing: “The goal of the Zan Ddl is to introduce sexual fluidity to respond to market logic. We all know that with the neutral gender it is easier to sell nail polishes to men too. We all know that this is the case, this is the truth ”, he said in the Chamber, unleashing the tussle. His words also echoed outside the Senate and became the subject of many critical comments on the web.