WASHINGTON – A Consumer Financial Protection Bureau order against a provider of income-share agreements signals regulatory tightening for all ISAs, but could also give the education finance sector legal clarity, observers said.
ISAs offer tuition money in exchange for some of a student’s future income. While many see the product as a progressive alternative to traditional student loans, consumer advocates say some have avoided regulatory scrutiny by claiming ISAs are not credit.
The CFPB agreed with consumer groups, saying in a consent order that Better Future Forward, a Virginia-based nonprofit, misled consumers by attesting that its products were not loans. The agency required that the nonprofit comply with consumer protection laws such as the Truth in Lending Act.
Some worry the CFPB’s approach could be stifling before ISAs have a chance to mature, especially if the bureau asserts more authority over the sector. But several ISA proponents say the guidelines outlined in the Better Future Forward lend more regulatory certainty.
Read Also
- Skyscrapers, the Emmys and her shoe collection: Irina Baeva shared aspects of her new life in New York Sep 23, 2020
- Ingrid Chauvin : actress reveals images of its first outing post-containment with Tom, his son May 23, 2020
- Lady Louise : this passion that she shares with her great-grandmother Elizabeth II May 23, 2020
- Prince Harry : this round sum recovered for the enjoyment of Meghan Markle May 8, 2020
- The US sanctioned an oil trafficking network that finances the Iranian regime and Hezbollah terrorists May 25, 2022
- Glacial melting threatens 7 million people in Pakistan May 31, 2022
- What is Hive Social, the new alternative to Twitter? Nov 25, 2022
“There’s a little more downside risk now, but there’s also more upside potential as well,” said Ethan Pollack, a program director at the nonprofit Jobs for the Future.
“With the CFPB declaring jurisdiction over ISAs, at least with regard to [the Truth in Lending Act], certainly, there’s a question of how they’re going to use that power, and I think that there is some cause for concern, ”Pollack said. “But also, if they use that power wisely and in a way that is aligned with consumer interests, then I think you could achieve a lot greater regulatory clarity.”
Income-share agreements offer college students tuition funds in exchange for some of their future income. While many see the product as a progressive alternative to traditional student loans, consumer advocates say some providers have avoided regulatory scrutiny by claiming ISAs are not credit.
Bloomberg News
Others have doubts that the CFPB’s involvement will benefit the industry.